Monday, September 25, 2006

Liberte'

So what exactly is this liberatarianism and what is it demanding of us? As a political party it is not especially well supported ( candidates rarely get more than 5%) but people seem to self-identify with it's tenants or vague philosophy en masse. As a strain of the broader conservative movement it seems to dominate here in the Rocky mountain and south- west. But what is it?

This spring organized signature gatherers showed up at the malls and shopping centers of Montana to garner support for three ballot initiatives they hoped to have us voting on this November. The "lightening rod" was called the anti- eminant domain initiative and played off the basic and very prevelant anti-government , anti-regulation sentiment whipped to frenzy level by a recent court case which allowed government condemnation for economic development purposes. Language also buried in this two-part initiative , of which most signers were not aware, would make any government regulation (excepting those protecting health and safety) which restricted profit-making to be considered a "taking" of property and make the regulating agency, city, county, state, liable for reimbursement costs.

Now in this county, plenty of people would have knowingly signed such a petition, but regardless, it ran into issues of fraud and was taken off the ballot by a district judge. Some investigation found the signature gatherers were being paid handsomely (so handsomely they faked a bunch) and the money trail eventually wound to an incredibly wealthy New York City real estate developer named appropriately enough ,Frank Rich. It turned out Mr.Rich was financing similar ballot measures all across the region, at tremendous cost to himself, because of his strong libertarian ideology. The almost perfect capitalist contradiction. Though I guarantee the irony would be totally lost on both him and his minions. Buying "grassroots" democracy to further liberty that would subvert grassroots democracy? Be that as it may, what is this world they hope to bring about? The people through a process of direct democracy, fighting the monied forces of development and speculation, have tried (unsuccessfully for the most part) to design land use regulations to protect the things they collectively find to be of value. Aesthetic values, open space, clean water, habitat, have all been fought over tooth and nail here and Mr. Libertarian Rich Guy wants to butt in all the way from NYC and declare individual propery rights sacred. If someone wanted to build a feedlot or asphalt plant next to my house it is his/her God given right.I would be obligated to pay him all the profit he didn't get to make off his nuclear power plant. Whaco. So their perfect world is a chaos of unchecked individual desires,where one worships property and is driven by selfishness . Lovely.

I have had some interesting debates with a fellow from Bozeman named John Baden, a self described libertarian who runs the Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment. He also hates the Endangered Species Act because it restricts the freedom of corporations to make (huge) profits. He , like other industry sponsored foundations and think-tanks of the libertarian right such as Heartland Institute or the Reason Foundation, promotes an Ayn Randian "free market" utopia where every creature is assigned a dollar value. He works against "smart growth", land use planning ,environmental regulation or any other democratic process which might promote the public trust. For him, Margaret Thatcher, and the pathetic "sagebrush rebellion" types wedded to the myths and pathos of rugged, frontier individualism,
"there is no such thing as society."

10 Comments:

At 6:48 AM, Blogger A Wiser Man Than I said...

The way I see it, there are three types of libertarians. First, there are your economic libertarians, who, apparently, really believe that Ayn Rand would lead us to utpoia. The defense of "true" capitalism--whatever that means--is tolerable, but to pretend that corporations fulfill this need is naive at best.

Second, there are social libertarians; usually these guys have one issue, and simply want to _____ (fill in the blank: smoke weed, engage in strange sexual perversions, etc.)

Third, there are libertarians like me--not to put myself too much on a pedestal. Government is evil, but neither can it be fought, especially by government. Thus we stay home, don't generally annoy anyone, save with our smugness, and try to get some sort of laugh out of the whole affair erupting in flames, much to everyone's surprise--save us.

 
At 7:59 AM, Blogger troutsky said...

So they are shape shifters, moving targets.Moving in and out of conservatism at will they are philosophically incoherant yet are so easily manipulated they becomea political force almost by default. Scary.

I realize you are able to articulate your positions,wiser ,and even provide some foundation for them. Im surrounded by nativist knuckleheads who believe in "frontier justice" and are WELL armed.

 
At 8:10 AM, Blogger Pocho said...

I take most I encounter who claim they are as one of two sorts. Bigoted US republicans ashamed to admit they are, and those pretending to hold themselves above that but lack the guts to scream the coda "Hooray for me and screw everyone else."

 
At 10:26 AM, Blogger The Continental Op said...

You actually know this F.R.E.E. guy? They are perhaps best known for holding "educational" junkets at which they indoctrinate judges in the tenets of "law & economics" -- i.e. the application of "free market" economic ideology (er, I mean, "objectively neutral, scientific, value-free principles") to addressing legal issues.

 
At 10:30 AM, Blogger The Continental Op said...

Following up on pocho's comment, the best definition I've ever heard of a "libertarian" is "a college Republican who's trying to get laid."

Of course, I would consider myself a "red libertarian", in the Emma Goldman tradition, though I've all but given up hope of ever reclaiming the term for the left.

 
At 5:07 PM, Blogger A Wiser Man Than I said...

Conservatism is a bankrupt idealogy because it is, at best, a way to postpone the march to tyranny. Libertarianism is the philosophy that government is evil.

The difference between a republican gone libertarian (to get laid, humorous, or whatever) and a trube libertarian is that the former is disgusted with Bush, but sees no problem with voting for the next GOP smuck to march down the line; the latter doesn't have faith in the GOP and will either vote for a candidate who will veto everything or will refuse to vote at all.

Come election time, you'll be able to tell the difference very clearly. A true libertarian wouldn't vote for the Republican to keep Hillary out because he doesn't see a difference between the two.

 
At 8:33 PM, Blogger Renegade Eye said...

The ultimate libertarian is Jesse Ventura. He epitomizes the best and worse.

 
At 10:27 PM, Blogger troutsky said...

All those definitions ring true in my experience and it is confusing and frustrating.Noam Chomsky calls himself a libertarian socialist- anarcho syndicalist ,a real mouthful.But he has certainly considered the philosophical/political lineage that leads him to this position and I know other principled libertarians but they are notoriously hard to pin down in terms of vision.

Oh yeah cont-op, I have dealt with Baden and his sidekick Pete Gedes,a frustrating experience all in all.And I know about their controversial seminars or workshops for judges, scary deal.Check out their web site and you find links to the Heritage Foundation and others of similar ilk and you start to understand where the money comes from.Like Condi is a true believer in gunpoint democratization, these guys are true believers in laissez- faire environmentalism.

 
At 12:58 PM, Blogger The Continental Op said...

I have a sort of personal interest in F.R.E.E. I've published an article about "Law & Economics" and its influence on judges. As a follow-up, I've been interested in doing a study of judges who attend the F.R.E.E. seminars, and seeing whether it makes a difference in their subsequent decisions. Perhaps you can get me in with these guys. ;-)

 
At 9:50 PM, Blogger troutsky said...

Id love to read the article, is it online? I have no "in" with FREE but could probably manufacture one through certain sources. I think such a study would be fascinating and I would help in any capacity.After badgering them for a couple of years they sent me a beautiful color print of a wolf and her cub.I dont get it?MaybeI should start in on them again and see what kind of swag comes my way.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home