Saturday, February 23, 2008

Fear of Emptiness?

In the Texas debate Barack Obama said that US foreign policy had neglected Latin America, something he would right. By not providing "aid" and establishing a dominant presence "people like Hugo Chavez or the Chinese fill the void". Maybe he's being schooled by Beakerkin on global hegemony or maybe he was just pandering to a crowd that believes what it reads in Time magazine or The Wall Street Journal, but either way it's a sad contradiction from the man who said about Iraq ,"We need to change the mindset that got us there in the first place." Same damn mindset. He knows what USAID and the NED really do, doesn't he?



When you view regions of the world as places that are either occupied or a "void" instead of places filled with people, people with complex histories and societies that have their own trajectories and aspirations, you have bought into that whole "Great Game" view that has characterized every modern Empire. Soft power means trade and debt, aid and militarization, resource extraction and Coca Cola. All the mainstream candidates and policy wonks who they listen to think of the globe as a volume which becomes filled with " capitalist-democracy" and the American Way of Life. Throw in a little Christian zeal and White Mans Burden. ( we're going to have to come up with a new term considering Barack, Condi and Colin )It's the Missionary Position and Kissinger, Albright, Baker, Holbrooke, Brzezinski, Lake, Dennis Ross and the whole crew are on top, sweating away, filling that void. (apologies to Freud)

I don't imagine the economic advisors spending much time talking about overaccumulation either. They concentrate on the micro - oil prices, bubbles, stimulus packages and tax rates- things where they believe they can have some direct control, but someone should start paying a little attention to Mr. Bellow:

"The stagnation of the real economy is related to the condition of overproduction or over-accumulation that has plagued the international economy since the mid-1970s. Stemming from global productive capacity outstripping global demand as a result of deep inequalities, this condition has eroded profitability in the industrial sector. One escape route from this crisis has been “financialization,” or the channeling of investment toward financial speculation, where greater profits could be had. This was, however, illusory in the long run since, unlike industry, speculative finance boiled down to an effort to squeeze out more “value” from already created value instead of creating new value."

Walden Bellow doesn't mention that ever-popular method of wealth creation known as primitive accumulation. Screw the soft power and go get what you want. Devote your budget to militarization! "Fill that void" with bases and embassies and the United Fruit Company.

10 Comments:

At 1:06 PM, Blogger Ché Bob said...

Trout,

Great observation! Chomsky has been pointing for years that Latin America falls into its own unique category for U.S. foreign policy makers. It's a foregone conclusion that this hemisphere belongs to us and that it is our duty to direct life here.

However, I like how you pointed out that so much about U.S. rhetoric intentionally ignores all pre-existing cultures, societies and people. Our language also forgets our historical role in creating the messes many Latin American nations find themselves drowning in.

Thanks for taking Obama to task. He ain't nothing but "a lot of talk and a badge." The new sheriff...same as the old ones.

 
At 1:47 PM, Blogger Frank Partisan said...

Obama doesn't seem to want to change anything, as far as the Monroe Doctrine.

This period is the first time, that capitalists only need to concentrate on making $$, rather than productive investing. The idea that debt can be sold, is incredible. At the same time China invests in productive enterprise. They are so connected that China can't bail them out.

See this. It's long, but worthwhile. It's a perspective document for the next period.

 
At 4:55 PM, Blogger Graeme said...

I heard someone call Obama a Marxist the other day.

 
At 2:40 AM, Blogger beakerkin said...

The deluded semi idiots ignore the posters of Che Guevara in the Houston
offices of Obama.

Of course Troutsky and Che Bob take Thereisenstadt tours from governments
and think they know more about what is going on than people who live there. Why haven't any of you chicken collectivists renounced your citizenship?

 
At 9:38 AM, Blogger troutsky said...

Policy Wonk Samantha Power (noted human rights, international law scholar, author) was on Democracy Now tring to dissemble some of Obamas remarks.I take a harsh tone with these folks though I know they mean well and know much, much more than I do, or even Beak.She wrote a book about UN failure in Rwanda yet never confronts the ultimate contradictions of democracy, capitalism and imperialism.Thats the blind spot which is so frustrating!

Beak, you suggest sitting at home watching Fox news and reading The Weekly Standard as an alternative to touring foreign lands with an open, critical mind? (we both roundly critique Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia etc) Fair and Balanced?

 
At 10:50 AM, Blogger troutsky said...

By the way, Lenins Tomb (ive created a link at long last) has a good piece on the Scahill -Powers debate

 
At 1:35 PM, Blogger sonia said...

Che Bob,

Chomsky has been pointing for years that Latin America falls into its own unique category for U.S. foreign policy makers.

Interestingly enough, Chomsky has never complained that Chechnya, Ukraine and Georgia "falls into its own unique category for RUSSIAN foreign policy makers".

Chomsky is too blind and stupid to see a parallel between US not wanting Soviet nuclear bases in Cuba in 1962, and Russia not wanting missile bases in Poland in 2008. But somehow, the same Chomsky who want US to keep their hands off Cuba, have never organized a march to tell Putin to keep his dirty paws off Poland...

Chomsky is a fucking leftist hypocrite!

 
At 2:45 PM, Blogger troutsky said...

Sonia, consider this. Chomsky may just feel, as I do, that his rightful duty as a tax paying (read complicit supporter) is to critque the policies of his own countries, not to try to draw every parallel. You make it sound like he is a staunch supporter of Russian policy! Would you then have him duty bound to comment on every policy of every country on earth? Who should keep their hands off Poland?

 
At 4:57 PM, Blogger beakerkin said...

Troutsky

Were the Nazi tours of Theriesenstadt
reflective of the Jewish experiencce in WW2. I speak to Cuban, Venezuelan and other refugees from the messes you rationalize every day.

Are you claiming to know more about Cuba than the refugees in my office who live there for decades. The material on FOX news is far more reality based than the garbage you read or Theriesenstadt tours.

If these countries are so great lets see you and Sponge Bob er Chester Cheetos er Che Bob renounce your citizenship and live there full time.

 
At 9:45 AM, Blogger sonia said...

Troutsky,

Chomsky may just feel, as I do, that his rightful duty as a tax paying (read complicit supporter) is to critque the policies of his own countries, not to try to draw every parallel.

I know you and Chomsky feel that way. But in my opinion, he (and you) are 100% wrong to feel that way.

No problem in the world will ever be solved if everybody would act like you and Chomsky: covering your own asses, "not in my name", "I only criticize my own government", "I feel guilty because my taxes are used to finance death squads", etc.

It's not about you and your guilt trips!

A Colombian paysant being hounded by death squads doesn't care about your guilt trips. He doesn't care if the death squads get their money from United States or from Venezuela. He doesn't care if his torturer got his training in the School Of America or in the Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow.

But even he, caught in the crossfire of that "glorious class struggle", probably knows what you don't seem to grasp - that all this game is just an excuse to oppress and to exterminate.

And that the simplest way to stop a senseless war is to help the stronger side against the weaker side. Doing the opposite (or doing nothing) only prolongs the conflict and the suffering.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home