Fear and Loathing in the Rockies
As the order of things begins to crumble, the reactionaries do what they have always done, revert to violence to maintain the order and a sense of control. A headline from our local paper here in the rural Rockies:
"Potential Violence Over Zoning Process a Growing Concern"
The local meetings over land use planning or forest travel planning or resource management have always been contentious affairs ,not for the faint hearted. But as the Spectacle gets more spectacular and the US slides into anarchic chaos (as Yeats put it: "The center cannot hold") people up here start packing heat. Our local Director of the County Planning Department cited recent comments heard at meetings such as "heads will roll" and "there will be blood" and "they should be lynched" which remind us all of the violent history of confrontation between government and citizens we have here in our little valley. Encouraged by a general sense of licentiousness, Bushes insistence on the right to torture just for instance, these vigilante types are re- banding back together to fight for property rights, moral values and the American Way of Life. Suzy Foss, who co-owns a huge gentleman ranch and whose husband is one of the biggest real estate brokers around sums it up like this in a letter to the editor :"We are told we need to consider what is best for everyone. Since when did we become a socialist state?"
The curious alliance between the git er done rednecks, out of work loggers, Christian Right and the Real Estate lobby is just another manifestation of the old Sage Brush Rebellion/ Montana Militia/ Libertarian Patriots coalition which had us in the national news a decade ago. Unfortunately, as the economy crumbles and US prestige around the world evaporates, these folks grab weaponry and start to target "the enemy within". Every regulation becomes the Creeping Red Menace or Devil in Disguise. Egged on by Country-Western Music and Glen Beck bad things can happen.
The modern state system of "molecular, integral, invisible control" is also subject to entropy. William Blakes sensitive ear picked up the subtle signs : "In every cry of every Man, In every infants cry of fear, In every voice, in every ban, the mind-forged manacles I hear". Of course the key to consent has always been to get people to auto-repress, to forge their own mental mannacles out of their own best hopes but when those hopes turn out to be an illusion, the image rather than the reality, chaos can ensue. Debord realized that "Once the running of the State involves a permanent and massive shortage of historical knowledge, that State can no longer be led strategically." Control of consumerist society requres that same massive shortage but we are learning that such methods can also have dangerous consequences. "Annie get your gun!"

10 Comments:
Did Suzy Foss really say that? That's rich! Ah yes, only in America.
BTW, I found that your link to my blog is slightly mispelled. You see, I tried to correct my rendering of the Walrus lyrics when I moved from Blogspot to Wordpress, though I still have it wrong...
That is Alexander Cockburn's crowd you are talking about. He thinks they are progressive.
I think it shows the values, of people isolated from the urban proletariat.
You are describing a phenomenon that is quite possitive despite its flaws. A distrust of the government is always a healthy thing.
"Defending property rights" - now, that's incredibly radical.
"Since when did we became socialist state" - every state is a socialist state. There is no other one. But it's not necessarily an internationalist socialist state. There are also national socialist states...
I agree there are healthy aspects to distrust of government, sonia.The ability to find a balance is what has been lost ie.the political, due to the democracy deficit. We part ways when it comes to property. And the distinction between corporate state and "true" (theoretical,not historical) socialist state.
Troutsky,
We part ways when it comes to property.
I am glad to hear it. Although I will only believe you when you will send me all your money. A check will be fine.
Sonia:
...every state is a socialist state...
Ah, yes, true in the sense that states are communal enterprises intended to advance the common good. You seem to be granting the state legitimacy, albeit with a healthy dollop of distrust. Just like our Founding Fathers!
Problem is, you also have people like Suzy Foss who regard any communal action as socialist imposition on their sacred rights. Meanwhile, they are happy to feed at the public trough offering them subsidies, open an hidden. They are also happy to have the government hinder other people from getting what they might want when it will inhibit the accumulation by the Suzys of the world. In other words, when I get what I want, that's natural rights. When anyone tries to limit what I get, that's socialist devilry.
So, let us accept the inevitable, death, taxes, and the state. We cannot live without one anymore. And let's discuss rational limits on its powers accoring to transparent statements of our values, not vicious and self-serving (not you, of course) assertions of greedy proprietorship.
As for property rights - it seems so simple, but property is only defined communally, isn't it? That raises a bit of a question, I would think...
Props on the poetry references. Keep those coming!
We're talking about posse comitatus types, backward, isolated and rural.
Lichanos points out the irony of our "system" (political economy - state/production ), socialism for the wealthy , capitalism for the rest of us.
Irony of ironies...Is THIS an irony. The classical definition of irony is a situation that produces the opposite of what's intended - You buy a gift for your beloved and she has a heart attack from the shock and joy of it. THAT's ironic!
As for our system, this is PLANNED!
Post a Comment
<< Home