Layers
My never ending quest for "my fair share of abuse" led me to a meeting put together by the Higher Ground Foundation on Wed. night. One of the biggest issues dividing our local community is land use planning ,with those wishing for planned growth through zoning squared off against those who feel their property rights (and much, much more) threatened. This fight has been raging in various forms for twenty years and I went to the meeting to check in on the state of the opposition. (I'm in favor of a Growth Plan, these folks are vehemently opposed) As an amatuer socioligist I find this valley a fascinating laboratory. It is called "higher ground" because the wealthy funder knowingly (in defiance of regulations) built his house in the flood plain and was forced to move it.
The gal doing the actual presentation was obviously uncomfortable speaking in front of crowds. Her hands were shaking so bad she could not hold and read the papers. She had tried to organize her materials and her thoughts but her argument was so convoluted and incoherent that she soon lost track of her thread (the Plan had grown too big and complex, process was not fair, elite forces had too much power) and fell back on what is, after all, the core issue : the rate of change is outstripping their ability to comprehend all it's ramifications.
It is really a microcosm of the planet at large with environmental damage affecting the economy (mills shut down due to over-harvest, degradation, markets), cultural wars raging, ( ranchers , loggers vs newcomers, progressives), religious and political extremism (Assembly of God, Mormons and militia-types) and a steady influx of retirees, nouveau-riche and attendent service workers driving up land places, sending ugly sprawl along highway corridors and generally "changing everything".
She put down the papers and her notes and told the assembled that what was at stake was nothing less than Our Freedom and The American Way of Life. Property rights were sacred as was the capitalist system they upheld. Zoning was an attack on the Constitution. Open space requirements, stream set-back regulations, urban clusters, restrictions on Big Box store development, in sum all imposed limits, were "takings", encroachment by the government on individual liberty and free enterprise. This led to a discussion on the U.N. and it's agenda for a New World Order. It could have led to the Illuminati but we ran out of time and adjourned. Welcome to my world.

4 Comments:
I understand the knee-jerk reaction against zoning and all that - standard fare - but if the rate of change is outstripping the ability to comprehend its ramifications, are those affected HAPPY with the changes? Do the same people who damn regulations complain about how the community and landscape is being ruined?
It's gonna be growth until we learn to keep it in our pants more often. Corporations are only guilty for profiting on our cancerous population increase rate.
Sorry to be so simple about what has become so sophisticated as to be a nearly impossible food, water, leadership, dogma, energy, economy, ecology problem while we argue who's at the head of the line at the gang bang.
That is quite a bit to subject yourself to. I have the luxury of complaining about Maoists.
Lichanos, it is an interesting question of aesthetics as much as anything else. Many of these folks seem to have no problem with gravel pits and huge neon signs. Others are wealthy enough to insulate themselves.Zoning is also about conservation, habitat preservation, energy use and sustainability. These concepts have little truck.
greg, I'll agree with overpopulation if you'll accept the fact that a small minority uses the vast majority of resources and is responsible for a vast majority of our ills.
Ren, It's like reading right-wing blogs, a wierd tonic.
Post a Comment
<< Home