Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Nostalgia

Seeing the NAACP marching into Selma for voting rights a couple days ago should give us pause. Just the Groundhog Day aspect of it, struggling for contraception or the right to collectively bargain or to register to vote, is a sign that MLK's "long arc of justice" might bend randomly unless people are willing to re-evaluate their strategy.

Of course one wants to reflect on history, to consult and interrogate, but simply replicating what once seemed to work is an emotional, simplistic response that avoids the hard question. Like, if it really worked, why are we doing it again? How is it these "rights" end up so ephemeral and fragile? What if we're not asking the right questions?

One thing we might need to look at is the role of civil society. We like to imagine it is the site of people power and participation but what if instead it is a self-referential feed-back loop designed as a pressure relief valve? What if it veils real power and keeps us on a carousel of activism while discreetly ignoring the reproduction of injustice and inequality behind the screen?

Environmentalists always point back to the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, women to Roe v Wade, Progressives to the New Deal, Populists to the Grange, westerners to the Frontier, immigrants to the Statue of Liberty. But moving forward, getting off the carousel, means examining the past with am unsentimental eye and asking what about the road not taken. For labor this means looking at the rightward drift of the AFL-CIO. For environmentalists this means looking at their embrace of Market Solutions or regulation by the capitalist state. Minorities might have to look at voting.

8 Comments:

At 9:03 AM, Blogger Ducky's here said...

Good post trout, I think you summarize the situation well.

It erodes bit by bit and Kapital still has its hands around our neck even when it isn't squeezing quite as tightly as it is now.

 
At 2:03 PM, Blogger SecondComingOfBast said...

Wait a minute. Who the fuck is "struggling for contraception"? Troutsky, have you lost your fucking mind? Who in the fuck is denying anybody the right to practice contraception? You can fuck pretty much anybody you want to fuck as long as they're consenting adults, I personally always buy rubbers from a truck stop men's john vending machine for seventy five cents anytime I go there for breakfast, you can buy pills, gels, IUDs, shit you name it, all kinds of sex aids, for example something called "Horny Goat Weed", and abortion has morphed from a multi-million dollar cottage industry into a multi-billion dollar megalith.

But people are "struggling"? Where? How? Why?

Maybe the government should have to provide me with a fucking whore once a month, how's that?

 
At 11:33 AM, Blogger Ducky's here said...

Well, right now it's contained but what would happen if L'il Ricky Retardo packed the court?

Other than praising him for nominating "moral" leaders who will use the rights disdain for settled law you wouldn't say a thing.

 
At 9:04 PM, Blogger SecondComingOfBast said...

Bullshit Ducky! People are according to Troutsky "struggling for contraception". That was his choice of words.

And you're god damn right I'd applaud Santorum's choice of Judges. I don't know what "settled law" you're afraid they'll "disdain" (probably the "right" of leftist lunatic art teachers to force grade school students to piss on crosses in bottles), but I do know they would uphold and respect the constitution and Bill of Rights they way its written. Grrrrrr

 
At 2:36 AM, Blogger beakerkin said...

Troutsy

Pay for your own contraception and condoms.

Communism is a Codeword for theft
and abuse of power. How many posts
did you write about China's one child rule? How many did you write about the very high rates of abortion in the Soviet Union due to lack of cotraception.

Get your stinking mitts of my wallet you communist ape

 
At 10:40 AM, Blogger troutsky said...

Patrick; My point is there was a long cultural struggle to normalize the concept of family planning and sex as something than purely reproductive for females. This is the renewed attack which is veiled in the language of "welfare" and social expenditure and eventually sluts.

Beak's comment is the perfect example, he believes it's all about his wallet when we are really talking about traumatic cultural change which remains unsettled.

 
At 10:44 AM, Blogger troutsky said...

Let me add more nostalgia: a pining for a time when the national discourse was less polarized, when Walter Cronkite was an objective journalist, when Americans were less greedy or consumption crazed. When warfare was more honorable. etc..

 
At 1:59 PM, Blogger Ducky's here said...

The issue of contraception and the role of coverage in a total health care system can cause a little tunnel vision as emotions flare.

Let's step back and look at what the left is trying to do as it pushes against our insane for-profit health care delivery system.

1. Movement of the much of the systems profit and overhead to actual care through a single payer system.

2. Attention to a comprehensive preventative care and maintenance model.

Both ideas present in nations with less expensive care and better outcomes than our own system.
Please note that contraception is reasonably part of the second goal.

We could move there and see better health outcomes and lower costs but the like of Beak (who gets his coverage off the public teat already, the irony) will start throwing up as many barriers as possible to informed discourse.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home