Friday, January 27, 2006

Mind/ Body

For the February 2000 demonstration in Washington DC ( the worlds failed attempt to stop a war before it starts) ,my wife and I had decided to walk with the Buddhist Peace Fellowship delegation, a group of twelve or fifteen mindful souls in the midst of several hundred thousand highly agitated protesters. Concurrent with the anti-war demonstration that day there was also a pro-Palestinian rally in the Mall and the combined energy was intense. We bounced back and forth between the Peace folks and the Palestinians until it was time for the march down to the capitol, at which point we hooked back up with the Buddhists, grabbed our signs, and began to meld into the throng. We had decided beforehand to do a walking meditation, focusing on engagement without anger or ill will and so we would stick together, stay cool, and work towards a little enlightened peace making.

Which was all well and good until we reached a point where the entire pro-Palestinian faction, with their colorful clothes and militant slogans began to merge with the peace folks. The atmoshere buzzed and crackled with the directed energy, and suddenly the Buddhists decided to split off from the crowd and walk separately. I’m fine with hanging with Buddhists but I definitely wanted to also be with the People, my people, fired up, mobilized,agitated people. My wife, who has a much deeper practice than I, felt the same way,though she is a little more intimidated by the intensity of mass gatherings. We like the drums and chants and costumes and signs, the beautiful and powerful theatre of it all, and I appreciated the power we represented as an organized opposition. I could understand the meditators desire for a less passionately electrified atmosphere but at the same time felt their calming presence would be a welcome force within the group and that they should integrate and meld rather than set themselves apart.

Being engaged and mindful in this often chaotic melee we call modern civilization is a delicate,even intricate balancing act. The degree of injustice combined with the increased sense of urgency means less space for the deliberative, contemplative approach desirable in ideal situations. Times shape tactics, and the luxury of personal spiritual fulfillment is weighed against the brutal reality of death and hunger and blood and suffering. It would be nice to change the consciousness of the planet one meditation at a time. But sometimes you have to take to the streets.

"..the experts decided,in the interests of public safety, that they must have a powerful standing army, consisting mostly of veterens- for they put so little faith in raw recruits they deliberately start wars to give their soldiers practice, and make them cut throats 'just to keep their hands in',as Sallust rather nicely puts it."
Thomas More Utopia

5 Comments:

At 6:45 AM, Blogger chris said...

great post.

thoughts on the Hamas victory?

 
At 5:50 PM, Blogger troutsky said...

I have studied the conflict for two decades and feel the situation is in some way moving beyond the realm of rational discourse, into some shadowland.I have opinions about EVERYTHING but feel anything I say just adds to the muddled confusion.
Leaving a conference put on by Christian Palestinians a couple of years ago, and being a socialist, I thought a one state solution best in a long term, idealistic way.I did not foresee the rise of I
Islamists.

If the US put half the funding it gives Israel every year into the P.A ( not through direct expenditure but NGOs) they could start to form a viable state, then demand more contiguous land.
What about you?

 
At 5:56 PM, Blogger troutsky said...

Joy Division, my other daughters band did a whole show as a retrospective on their music,including some old film.First Id ever heard of it and Im a geezer.

 
At 10:10 PM, Blogger A Wiser Man Than I said...

I don't know how much good U.S. money is going to do. Those people are awful ticked off, as you note "beyound the realm of rational discourse". I'm not saying I have an answer only that any solution to this conflict is going to take "a wiser man than I" to figure it out.

I hope to God that things remain relatively peaceful down there, but the Hamas victory can't be good news for most reasonable folks. Let's see what the neo-cons have to say about the wonders of democracy now.

 
At 11:50 PM, Blogger troutsky said...

They are now making distinctions between "liberal" and il -liberal democracy,I don't know if we are talking Locke or Jefferson or what.It is basically incoherant, at least to me.You should go over to neo-neocon sometime and experience the , how should i put this, various levels of analysis.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home