American Dream
Daniel Lazare does a great job dissecting Todd Gitlins new book, The Intellectuals and The Flag, in the newest Nation. Anyone who has read this blog knows the impetus for starting it was an article by Norm Geras in Dissent, working over the unpatriotic response of the "American Left" to 9/11. Michael Waltzer, Paul Berman, Thomas Friedman, blogger neo-neocon, others ad nauseum all have tried to explain their feelings about the attack on their "homeland" , have tried to excite themselves into some nationalist pride, justify the war, or understand their fear. The so called intellectuals theorize on how to gain political advantage for "progressives" by adopting a little more "mainstream" rhetoric (moronic platitudes). Drivel, pathetic drivel.
I just returned from a country where people on the street, people in shops and in schools and on buses and in restaurants use language like this to describe what is happening to their nation, why they are proud of their nation, why they are patriotic: profound social transformation. Re-distribution of wealth. Self-determination. Participatory democracy. Development models created by the People. Bolivarian revolution. Socialism for the twenty first century. Taking power from the small ruling class, from the oligarchs, and giving it back to the people.
What if the American political discourse sounded a little more like this and a little less like the pathetic self-castigation of the left or bombastic exceptionalism of the right? Forget intellectuals, (thankyou Chomsky, Roy,Klein, Mailer, Vonnegut,Vidal and others) Im talking about conversations with your friends and neighbors, in your restaurant, on your bus, in your school. Use words like justice, like ruling class, like power, and see how liberating it is, how patriotic you can suddenly feel, how you can suddenly feel hope again for an ideal (America) that got lost but can find it's way back if we can once again be proud of who we are.

3 Comments:
Would your ideas fit the mold in modern day America? I cannot envision it, although any dialogue would be a good start.
Something extraoridnary hit me today. I'm interning for a computer company this semester--we do servers and the like. For some reason I was thinking about... economic policy and what have you on one of my many trips to the bathroom. It occured to me that those who lived as I do really had need for nothing.
There will always be things I will want. There are many, many books I still would like to read, and I could drop a hundred dollars at a used record store at the drop of a hat. But these are silly wants, and I know they'll never be satisfied, and indeed, try to take comfort in that.
I think I'll make my point yet. Saturday evening, my cousin and I were walking down Grand Ave in St. Paul, MN, smoking some newly purchased pipe tobacco and enjoying a relatively warm winter night. Now, Grand Ave. is an upscale neighborhood--actaully almost exclusively commerical, but still, upscale. And the men and women were there, chasing their silly things, in and of themselves not bad for certain, but still, consumerism on display.
I did not pine for revolution, but I did wonder what will happen when this comes crashing down as it assuredly will. I do not think socialism is palatable with modern America, but it is something to consider nonetheless, if only as a curious observer.
What is different about socialism in the twentty-first century? Have you looked into the--admittedly laregly hypothetical--distributism of Hillaire Belloc and G.K. Chesterton? I think you may find it to be a pleasant change from the socialism with which I cannot reconcile myself, speaking, I am afraid for a great many others as well.
In any case, it is good to have you back.
I too enjoyed Lazare's review. Gitlin's book sounds like a load of crap. I used to be an avid Dissent reader, but gave it up years ago because it got kind of boring. I'm glad I wasn't reading it in its pro-Iraq War incarnation. I'm afraid Woody Allen's joke has come true: Dissent has merged with Commentary to become Dysentery. I'd like to think that Irving Howe is spinning in his grave.
I am sadly uninformed about the political-economic theories of either Chesterton or Belloc but will add it to the list.All reasonable revolutionaries (oxymoron?) share your concern about radical change in the developrd world, especially US, unformed theories abound, my own included.The first quest is to question the framework, which both you and I and other sensitive people are doing right now. our dissatisfaction has a moral basis and a long historical tradition as well as present day movements to draw on.Lets work on the critique and see where it leads.
Op - They (editors) have allowed their Zionist sympathies to cloud their judgement in all other foriegn policy issues, including the "War on Terror".They might as well start doing articles on Bird Hunting with Dick Chaney.I try to maintain a critical approach to the Palestinian issue but Waltzer and Co.have lost all pretense of balance.
I am headed up to BC this morning for about a week. Try to catch a silver or a steelhead or some kind of damn fish,Im Jones'n.
Post a Comment
<< Home