Went Down to the Demonstration, Again
In my never ending search for my fair share of abuse, I actually went to two demonstrations in the last two days which were juxtaposed by some Intrigueing Factors. The first was the Second Annual Missoula May Day celebration where a ragged band of Wobblies, anarchists, punkers and assorted Leftists gave a small but dedicated crowd some revolutionary hip hop, a biting Forum Theatre piece (with myself as the tyrannical university president), followed by the commandeering of one lane of Higgins Ave. in an un-permitted march (with song) to the County Courthouse where the IWW flag was proudly planted after an almost seventy year hiatus. When we yelled "happy May Day!" to the startled pedestrians, they would often sprout a smile as they recognized the symbolic import of our little island of Red and give a wave back. An older gentlemen approached me and asked whether I was the Marxist who" gave the speech last year". I reflexively ducked, but he simply shook my hand and told me how much he had appreciated my interjecting a radical, historical perspective. I invited him to take part in a broader discussion.
Contrast this with yesterdays "demonstration" where a hundred well-meaning liberal-progressive-peace activist types gathered by the road to protest Bush's veto. Cars honked and flashed the peace sign in solidarity as young childrens legs were blown off in Baghdad. We politely waved our signs and the local reporter showed up to document the dissent but in the end we got back in our cars and "stayed the course". I do wonder at the folks who gave us the finger. (perhaps beakerkin can enlighten me) Do they revile us? Their neighbors and fellow citizens?
Gary Younge agrees with my Don Imus-Duke Rape case analysis in his Nation essay. We have finally located the "nappy headed ho" and Rupert Murdochs New York Post plastered a "huge photograph of Crystal Gail Magnum" with the headline ,"Now America Can See Her Face". By the way, the New York Sun is to publishing what Fox news is to television journalism. Except it loses a million dollars a month, selling 13,000 hard copies a day (the Post sells 700,000) which it's four right -wing zionist investors ( Steinhardt, Tisch, a board member of the Manhattan Institute, Kovner, Chair of the American Enterprise Institute, Hertog,chairman of the Manhattan Institute) feel is worth it in order to get their propoganda out to beakerkin. Money talks, as they say.
Bush said leaving Iraq precipitously would create a situation similar to the one created in Cambodia when the US left Vietnam. This is the ever popular mass-slaughter argument for staying. Surprising though, that they would be anxious to use Vietnam analogies, unless they assume their re-write of history has been absorbed sufficiently by Joe Sixpack, who never really knew who or why we were fighting there in the first place. Bush didn't read the report by Ben Kienan and Taylor Owen of the Yale Cambodian Genocide Project which said "civilian casualties from US bombing drove an enraged populous into the arms of the Khmer Rouge insurgency." Who we aided through proxy groups (many allied to Communist China) so Pol Pot could get back to work in the killing fields. So it goes.
Labels: fake journalism, historical revisionism, vented frustration

12 Comments:
Here we go again with the idiotic
nonsense. Many firms want a NY presence for prestige. More to the point the NY Sun does not ask for handouts like Mother Jones or the Nation.The Daily News and NY Post also haven't been profitable in Years. A Newspaper like a sports team is a prestige item.
It delivers a high quality product that is appreciated in Manhattan. The low numbers are because it does not offer home delivery in the outer boroughs. Some Staten Islanders and Queens residents have asked.
The evaluation of a critically well acclaimed paper on the basis of its coverage of Israel and pointing to Jewish owners is anti-semitic. Moreover, this country allows Communists with a history of treason and sedition first amendment rights.
Who died and left subversive totalitarian appologists the arbiters of who should have the right to publish? Totalitarianism raises its ugly head along with anti-semitism.
Shall we lecture the owners of Black oriented papers next? What about Indian oriented papers? Sorry but advocates and appologists for police states and class genocide do not decide who is entitled to publish.
Well, Trout, looks like this character has some karmic message for you … ford the streams of spittle and squeeze through the crude cut spikes to find the essence of those you long to have hear you, it is who he is protecting. Or, not
Greg
I thought Burl Ives was dead? Maybe your other job is a Scooby Doo crook with G playing Shaggy.
Greg: Foiled by those capitalistic kids hawking cheap merchandise with a talking dog and an incoherent boy with the munchies.
Too long on earwax and too short on brains.
Cmon,editorial slant is one thing,but you don't really want me to quote the number of pro-Israel articles last year.Which is fine, as long as everybody understands the nature of it's "journalistic positioning".The Nation advertises itself as an opinion journal.If anti-semitism includes criticism of Israeli policy I am guilty but to make it so totally de-natures the real travesty of racial and ethnic hatred.I do not question the Suns right to publish in any way and extend my critique to any and all efforts claiming to be news, including the Workers Weekly,San Fran Chronicle, PBS or whatever.
Troutsky
You seem to think that the Nation or Mother Jones do not also have agendas. Maybe the masthead should read printed by apologists for totalitarian imbeciles.
The centrality of the left Elmer Fudd like dementia on Israel is anti semitic. Moreover, if you want to talk about agendas look at those in your own ranks like Suckerpunch or Idiotmedia.
You are going down the standard anti semitic Jooos own the media bit. Excuse me there is far more diversity of news in the USA than in Cuba with state controlled media. Many of the Europapers are state subsidized. The exception is the UK for now.
Chimpanzee doesn't semm bothered by Countries with State run media
like Cuba or all the Arab totalitarian ststes. Moreover, how one claims to be a dissident when his books are in every book store sold by academic coercion is a mystery. The Chimpanzee dissent is with reality itself, but he may endure bad cafeteria food in MIT or perhaps someone parked in his space. Meaanwhile by Chimpanzee brand toilet paper and condiments or pay $18.00 for his to caution you about greed. The Chimpanzee is more Barnum than you idiots will ever know. He grows wealthy telling you what you want to hear.
Greg has been demoted to the pet aisle.
"... the real travesty of racial and ethnic hatred."
You should think long and hard about that one. Who is the source of the real-time hatred in this world, racial, ethnic, and otherwise. Its not your designated oppressor groups. Sit back and consider the over-the-top emphasis on Israel (pop.=7,150,0003, area=22,145 km² [compare to Montana=381,156 km²]) in your media of choice, and you might realize that most of what you "know" about the situation is simply the mental images that populate the dreamlike, Leni Riefenstahl-esque meta-narrative of the left. A narrative that is drenched in vitriol and hate. The Duke boys illuminated the depths of that hatred/insanity and Israel brings it out in a big way. It's always the same.
And Bearkerdin is right: the whole idea of chomsky and zinn "speaking truth to power" is absurd.
You don't know my level of knowledge on that or any other subject, anon.You don't know how many times I have been to Israel, my level of scholarship,what books sit on my shelf, none of it. Try debating the issues rather than attacking a messenger you don't like and we might take you seriously here.
Let me feed you a little bone.I think the Palestinian resort to terrorist violence is a reprehensible and incredibly stupid tactic.The Islamist extremism fueling much of the violence is subverting the cause of forming a viable palestinian state.Israeli demolition of homes,extra-judicial targeted killing and continued settlement building is reprehensible and are incredibly stupid tactics for creating a just, democratic Israeli state.
anon,
What policies decisions do Chomsky and Zinn make? Like you and I, they don't have the power to make them.
Thanks to the concentration of wealth, power has been concentrated accordingly. Name an example anywhere in history to the contrary, where wealth is allowed to be concentrated in the hands of the few while power is equally distributed. One does not exist. Is this the best your worlds can offer us anon and beakerkin?
Bush said leaving Iraq precipitously would create a situation similar to the one created in Cambodia when the US left Vietnam. This is the ever popular mass-slaughter argument for staying.
Do you deny that mass slaughter will take place? I'm not a fan of our imperialistic war on terror, which you well know, but I can't shake the feeling that we're going to have a lot of blood on our hands no matter what we do.
Most of the violence in Iraq is COW troops on civilians and vice versa.
Most of the deaths in Iraq are caused by US aerial bombardment. The USAF is conducting 24/7 bombing runs in an already destroyed country. What would they be bombing other than civilian targets?
When will Beak and/or anon come up with any sort of argument or show any knowledge other than the mindless propaganda driven spittle laced invective that we've seen so far.
The answer is that they won't because the facts aren't on their side.
It's all Faux News volume over substance. All static and little signal. Blah blah antisemitism, blah blah communist, blah blah liberal, blah blah madrassa etc etc.
I've been to Israel and the occupied territories and the absurdity of these idiots telling me what I've seen is wrong or worse, antisemitic propaganda, is galling.
Every day is opposite day in America when it comes to the middle east. There is no truth spoken even by those labelled as enemies by the neofascist Likudnik racial supremacists.
Gaza is Warsaw redux.
I don't think any prediction is possible about the aftermath of US withdrawal due to the incredible complexity of the contingent factors so I object to the use of words like "bloodbath" "mass slaughter"or "genocide" etc.repeated over and over for propaganda effect.
I think beakerkins comments are valuable for the demonstration effect.They are representative of a virulent strain of ant-discourse which infects our politics.
the whole idea of chomsky and zinn "speaking truth to power" is absurd.
Actually, Chomsky himself has wisely observed that "speaking truth to power" is largely a waste of time, because power already knows the truth.
As for speaking truth to nudniks like anon. & beak. (power's cabinboys), zolst helfen vi a toyten bankes.
Post a Comment
<< Home