Axis of Evil Idiocy
Certain individuals were predicting a Venezuela- Colombia conflict based entirely on their total lack of understanding of the dynamics of the region, the same thing they base basically all their analysis on.(Check out Che Bob for more on this phenomena ) These people are still looking for the WMDs in Iraq, an attack in the Gulf of Tonkin, Cuban patriots to rise up in the Bay of Pigs, an al Qaeda -Saddam connection, a harmonious Zion, jobs created by NAFTA, and on and on. Condi "Peace Process" Rice is threatening to put Venezuela on "The List" and Sonia is comparing Chavez to Hitler. Senator Kyle of Arizona says all the events leading up to the invasion of Iraq are "water over the dam", that is, gone, irrelevent, erased, "history". Post surge "we are winning in Iraq" (lets not forget the role of torture in this "winning", John!) Meanwhile in China , the games go on, in this case we are not going to let a little violent repression get in the way of baseball or the Olympics. (Lot of money involved, as there is in Venezuelan oil and "re-building" Iraq)
Speaking of money, it looks like Bear-Stearns is just too large to let fail. Of course the people whose credit card debt and sub-prime mortgage they had hoped to profit from are allowed to fail, because they are the little people, (Thankyou Leona Helmsly) and the Market must punish little-people-who-fail in order to teach them a moral lesson (about prudence, humility, that sort of thing) Bear-Stearns get the Fed-Chase-Morgan bailout because morality is a huge joke for the ruling class. Here is how Mr. A put it (Theodore Adorno) :
"As naturally as the ruled always took the morality imposed upon them more seriously than the rulers themselves, the decieved masses today are captivated by the myth of success even more than the successful are. Immovably, they insist on the very ideology which enslaves them."
We saw the documentary In Debt We Trust last night where another irony was illuminated. Poor people are better victims for credit card companies (predators of the modern jungle) and therefore targeted especially because they feel more remorse about failing to pay a debt than the wealthy.
Finally, a little update on Suzy from the last post. This is how she finished her letter: "If you want our land, don't take it by zoning and takings, pay the fair market value for development rights and do with it what you want.That is called fair. That is what America is about."
She nailed it in my opinion, profitting from an inflated real estate market IS what America is all about. The "fair' part is tricky ,because her great grandparents stole it from the Salish Indians, but that is "water over the dam". I have told my neighbors I am putting in a motorcycle race track unless they pay me "fair market value". Capitalism is a beautiful system. Unlike many parts of the country, lot's of people are still moving here with lots of money in their pockets (traders for Bear-Stearns) because there is still lots of scenic beauty left, just waiting to be trashed and homogenized. Ending on a bright note, here is an excerpt from a letter to the editor that followed Suzys' : (there is still hope)
"Years ago I would have fought and yelled at any politicians who tried to tell me what to do with my own land...twenty years of watching the water and wildlife have wised me up a bit...I think it is a good idea for the county to restrict building, especially in riparian zones. Setbacks protect newcomers and goofs like me from making costly mistakes that adversely affect ourselves, our neighbors and our qualities of life."
Sounds like a damn socialist! By the way, I just read that Wal Mart has given up on it's plans for a SuperCenter here. Dissapointing The Citizens For Free Enterprise who were pushing it. ( is Suzy a member?)
posted by troutsky @ 10:30 AM
14 comments
14 Comments:
Nice post you damned commie, fascist, pinko Troutskyist!
Will we be able to ride snowmobiles in your Motor-cross park during the winter? By the way, remember not to take out a loan to open that park or you'll end up giving it away to Suzy in the end. You'd better instead go to our secret commie stash for funding!
Thank god or someone that that Wal-Mart was stopped...for now!
Take care you damned Leon Trotsky trust-funder! Say hello to Uncle Hugo Fidel Ernesto Lenin for me when you're in California.
Lets see a person who advocates and rationalizes policies where fresh meat and produce are as common as UFO's should not talk about Bear Sterns. The folks on Wall Street will find other work and will be living in decent housing with produce and meat.
The person who knows nothing about Latin America is you. Funny I meet with Columbians several times a week and they loathe Communists. I never heard a single one criticize
the government. I also meet Venezuelans who have plenty to say
about Chavez and his foreign agents.
Che Sponge Bob is all knowing !!!1
He knows more about Venezuela and Cuba than people who spent their entire lives there.
Fresh meat, produce and decent housing for Wall Street gamblers, an excellent platform Beak!
So, beak-boy,
Where do you work? Are you working in a right-wing paramilitary recovery center?
By the way, "Columbia" is spelled "Colombia."
You are a sad little man; kicking and yelling because you are too useless and incompetent to run the show. And your buddy, "sponge bob," who specializes in child abuse, is even more pathetic. You are about 55 years old, and your adolescent love of a psychotic piece of shit grows with his fuck-ups. Hugo will go to hell you idiot, why don't you lead the way.
Troutsky,
Your post is a great party mix of ultra-leftist and conservative positions. I agree with your conservative positions. I disagree with your ultra-leftist positions.
Your conservative positions (that I share):
in China, the games go on
I am glad to know there is at least one Communist regime you oppose. But would you support US intervention in case Taiwan is invaded by China ?
Bear-Stearns get the Fed-Chase-Morgan bailout
There should be no bailouts. That's the conservatiove position that the Bush administration ignores.
I think it is a good idea for the county to restrict building
Again, a conservative position. Less urban sprawl, the better.
Your ultra-left positions that are simply wrong:
al Qaeda -Saddam connection
Read this before claiming that there were no links between Saddam and Al-Qaeda. The fact that there were no links between Saddam and 9/11 doesn't exclude links between Sadddam and Al-Qaeda. Leftist manipulators skillfully try to confuse the two issues.
Why on Earth would you defend Saddam anyway ?
Cuban patriots to rise up in the Bay of Pigs
Let's see, you are defending a dictator against rebels. Why ???
WMDs in Iraq
That mystery has been solved: Saddam didn't have any WMD, but he was pretending to have them to discourage US (or Iranian) invasion. Can't blame Bush on this one. It was Saddam's stupidity that did him in.
It was always a moot point, anyway. Iraq was a sovereign country. It had as much right to have WMDs as United States or Russia. WMDs should not have been mentioned as a reason for invasion. Saddam's financing of Palestinian suicide bombers and his gassing of the Kurds were reasons enough for removing him.
All hail Che Sponge Bob who gets all of his insights from prostitutes in Caracas. The All knowing Che Bob knows more about countries than the
people that have resided there for decades. All hail Che Sponge Bob who knows more about Cuba than Cubans. All hail Che Sponge who knows more about Venezuelans who can speak freely in this country.
On to the imbecile Troutsky. There
are plenty of jobs on Wall street.
your comments about gamblers shows
that you are an imbecile. Go to your local book store and see if there is a pop up book about finance.
Sonia
Che Sponge Bob, Ren and Saddam all are cut from the same mold. Look at the policies of Trotsky and Saddam.
Trout,
I think our biggest mistake was that we ever believed there was a worthy opponent in Sonia. (We were never so deluded as to give Beak nor Anon such a distinction). However, after this most recent comment by Sonia, I'm starting to wonder if it is the syphilis eroding her brain or if she is simply so uncomfortable with the use of actual evidence that she wasted everyone's time with this bullshit article from the Weekly Standard!
Wow! This article is a real doozy. I read every word of that article just to give her the benefit of the doubt, and now I understand what's wrong with Sonia, Beak and our special guest Anon: they get their evidence from the Pentagon! 6,000 pages of Iraqi documents that the Pentagon "discovered" after the invasion. Documents that would conveniently pad the Pentagon (Don Rumsfeld's and Co.) with after-the-fact justifications I might add.
Even if it amounted to what Sonia meant it to be, proof of a link between Saddam and Al-Qaeda (which it doesn't, which is why it was disregarded and laughed at around the world), she fails (not surprisingly) to understand the point: the U.S. created both Saddam and Al-Qaeda for its own purposes! Which they achieved, only to end up later to be in the way. In fact, we were fine with Saddam gassing Kurds since we were also funding Turkey to do the same thing. We've never cared that Muslims are killing Muslims. In fact, we've encouraged it...that is right up and until it interrupts or threatens to interrupt our unfettered access to OIL! That's where we drawn the line.
If you haven't read the article she provided, I'd encourage you to do so. Just to make it more convenient, I'll provide you with another link so you don't have to scroll back up to her brilliant thoughts. Here you go: Sonia's idea of EVIDENCE!
While you're there tell me if it doesn't remind you a little of the "salvaged laptops" from ground zero of a U.S. cluster bomb in Ecuador linking Chavez to the FARC.
At this point it is a waste of time to engage these clowns.
"At this point it is a waste of time to engage these clowns."
Isn't it technically called feeding the trolls?
Public blogs always fill up with this right wing craziness unless posts are moderated, but who would want to do that work?
I tried a blog briefly but decided I didn't want to be both an author and a censor and gave up the idea. Now I write for UnknownNews.net and they do the dirty work.
Peace brothers and sisters,
herb
Sonia: If China invaded Taiwan I would be neutral, because it would be an inter-imperialist war. China finished the long march to capitalism.
Bush is best compared to Nixon, both tried one last surge, after they knew the war was lost. Instead of acknowledging defeat, Bush sends more troops and threatens Iran. He just like Nixon, was provincial and adventurist.
No point to even acknowledge Beakkerkin, when no part of his sentences make sense.
No way would there have been a war in Latin America.
Beakerkin is right. The opposition has no free speech in Venezuela. They are all killed off by death squads. No rights to demonstrate, no media.
Notice how quiet Beakerkin is about the situation in Colombia? He only knows Columbia University.
Every Venezuelan I know is pro-Chavez. Some support the right of the Bolivarian movement, and some support the socialist wing. No gusanos in MN.
Che Bob,
Even if it amounted to what Sonia meant it to be, proof of a link between Saddam and Al-Qaeda (which it doesn't)
the U.S. created both Saddam and Al-Qaeda for its own purposes!
So first you persist in denying a link, only to claim in a sentence later that there was indeed a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda (via Washington).
Even my syphilis-infected brain can notice such a complete and blatant contradiction. What's your excuse for being so incoherent ?
We've never cared that Muslims are killing Muslims. In fact, we've encouraged it...that is right up and until it interrupts or threatens to interrupt our unfettered access to OIL! That's where we drawn the line.
Sorry, but the facts are against you. Saddam wanted to sell his oil. It was the US that imposed economic sanctions on him.
CheBob, it is about evidence, of course, but it is more about the way THEY (the " loyal opposition") analyzes data. Notice the system of logic, it is neither ideological in the sense of right-wing, conservative etc or rational. It is metaphysical.If I state that there is no Saddam -al Qaeda link I am somehow "supporting ' Saddam, WTF? If I say Condis attack on Chavez is irrational I become a Chavez acolyte. When you say the US supported both Saddam and al Qaeda this becomes a "link", though most rational people wouls understand I meant link in it's common context, as a 9/11 link. (the one the US administration attempted to establish)If I were to include EVERY link I would have to include the fact they were linked by the fact of both having toenails!
sonia, can China "invade" a territory already part of it's sovereign holding? If we were all part of One Big International Union there would be no such thing as border disputes. Hows that for ultra-left wing? BTW anon, I am 54, you have a remarkable gift!
Viva Stupidity
The lines of Che Bob are ignorance squared. Saddam was a Communist armed to the teeth by the Soviets with some Fwench airplanes. The BAATH party is a Socialist party with policies the master war criminal Trotsky used himself.
Since when does the USA make T series tanks, Migs and Mirage jets?
Ignore the obvious because Che Sponge Bob's warped theories do not fit reality.
The mindless Che Sponge Bob claims the USA crated Al Queda. US support went to Shah Mossoud who was killed on 9-10 by Al Queda. Meanwhile the minions of Marx were cheerleading chemical warfare against civilians and mines shaped like toys against the Afghan people.
Bin Laden was a bit player and a fund raiser at best who did next to zero actual fighting. Then again Che Sponge Bob would just prefer to
allow the Afghan people to die in peace under manifesto sanctioned hegemony.
One needs a labotomy to understand Che Sponge Bob
Troutsky,
can China "invade" a territory already part of it's sovereign holding?
I like this "part of its sovereign holding". Who decides what belongs in one's "sovereign holding" ? Are the Falklands part of Britain's "sovereign holdings" or Argentina's ? Was Sudetenland part of Germany's "sovereign holdings" ?
Every single nationalist war in history occured because one country's idea's of its "sovereign holdings" didn't exactly corresponed to another country's idea of its "sovereign holding".
Yes, Taiwan has always belonged to China. But it has never belonged to a Communist China.
If we were all part of One Big International Union there would be no such thing as border disputes.
That's a dangerous delusion. Of course, you can always put a heavy lid on such disputes. But one day, the pressure will reach such a boiling point that your lid will burst wide open and you will get Srebrenica and Chechnya...
most rational people would understand I meant link in it's common context, as a 9/11 link.
I don't care for "rational" people. I will take "irrational" Bush who overthrows dictators over "rational" cowards who kiss their asses anytime...
There is no "common context" in the distinction between Saddam-Al Qaeda links (which have been proven) and Saddam-9/11 links (which haven't been found). People who try to confuse the two are either neo-con liars or leftist liars. Both have to be denounced equally.
Post a Comment
<< Home