Imagining Alternatives
"It seems to be easier for us today to imagine the thoroughgoing deterioration of the earth and of nature than the breakdown of late capitalism."
Frederic Jameson
Certain readers of this blog will argue that they imagine either as equally preposterous but his point concerns the state of imagination more generally. It is about what John Lennon wrote his famous song about: I wonder if you can?
Those few with imagination propose alternatives in defiance of those who claim none exist. I give you this pamphletby the Organization for a Free Society as an example of work by those unwilling to succumb, work we should all be doing ( I include myself).
On Revolution: We stopped at an I Hop on the way to Oregon where a sign asked us to "Join the Pancake Revolution/ Pancakes to the People! seriously.
In the latest Mother Jones is a review of Revolution:The year I fell in love and went to Join the War- about Deb Unferth's time spent in Nicaragua in 87. "She didn't become a revolutionary" says the reviewer "but she did become a grown-up."
Two pages away we find an interview with rocker Eugene Hutz who fled Kiev in 86. "I have no agenda.I know what I love to do and that's my religion. I think political revolution discredited itself ONCE AND FOR ALL TIME.." I would rather read The Economist or Wall Street Journal.
National Geographic is doing a series on population, noting the earth is nearing the 7 billion human mark. They begin by taking a swipe at modern Malthusian Paul Ehrlich for stating in his 1968 book The Population Bomb that "hundreds of millions..are going to starve to death" in the 1970's. The authors state "the bomb was a dud.The green revolution...was under way.Today many people are undernourished but mass starvation is rare."
Actually, almost 130 million did die of causes related to malnutrition throughout that decade.They still die every day which seems like mass starvation to me.
They then state: "In Kerala, on the south west coast,investments in health and education helped fertility to fall to 1.7.The key, demographers there say, is the female literacy rate.." They seem uninterested, however, in WHY Kerala is advanced in these areas compared to the rest of India. Anyone know?
The article ends with: "How many of us there will be and how we will live-depend on CHOICES WE HAVE YET TO MAKE..."
Will "we" all have equal say? Will some choose to be poor and starve? This is a familiar capitalist narrative, that "we" all have agency and power, yada yada, but of course we know such choices never show up on a ballot or in a Market. Perhaps the February issue will tell us about the role of economic structures in reproducing inequality and the ideology around it, especially when it comes to impact and ecological footprint. Right.

15 Comments:
"In Kerala, on the south west coast,investments in health and education helped fertility to fall to 1.7.The key, demographers there say, is the female literacy rate.."
-----------------
The theory I've seen most often, trout, is that the number of children drops significantly if the first child lives. Moderate changes in nutrition and health care pay huge dividends.
As for Malthus, I think technology has found ways to extract resources more quickly and masked the end game.
the number of children drops significantly if the first child lives
Uh, Ducky? What are you always saying about Beak needing an editor? I want you to look at this sentence above, and tell me what you think might be wrong with it. Does it even begin to make any sense to you?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pagan, women who lose thier first child in infancy in poor countries have more children than those whose first child survives, simple.
Pagan, the Duck like all Marxists is a dumbass. The progress India has made is by ditching Marxist malfeasance and adopting market style reforms.
Marx = Death = Insanity = Stupidity
The planet will be made infinitely better if Commies follow the model of Jim Jones and practice class genocide on themselves.
Thanks Beak, we really count on you!
Actually, Kerala has been managed since it's inception in 56 as a democratic socialist welfare state. It is currently governed by the Left Democratic Front led by the Communist Party of India. It has the highest Human Development Index and lowest rates of corruption in the country.
Strikes,protests and marches are ubiquitous due to the comparatively strong presence of labor unions.It also has the highest equitable income growth. According to Wiki.
2011 might be your year to get a question right Beak, hang in there!
Trotsky
Once again your ignorance of India
is truly amazing. You totally ignore the bloodshed caused by Marxist extremists. You ignore the progress in India was made by ditching socialism for maarket reforms.
You also leave out that Kerala is a mainly Christian enclave.
Try learning the actual history of the things you write about, dumbass.Then again as a follower of a criminal philosopher who advocated genocide you are hardly prone to rational thought.
You will remain ignorant until you
release yourself from the mental slavery of Marxist dogma. Mendicant
failed philosophers who are long dead never had any relevance to any matters in the real world.
The imbecile poultry claims to admire Owen without grasping Owen's
low opinion of Marx and his criminal philosophy.
@Beak - You also leave out that Kerala is a mainly Christian enclave.
-------------------
Why is that relevent, Officer Obenhein?
Oh, by the way Officer Dipstick, Owen was a capitalist in the end and quite paternalistic.
I believe he died about the time Kapital was gaining a readership so I'm not sure what he felt about Marx.
At best they represent a distinction between Socialism and Communism but Owen was never that far from Capitalism
Oh, trout, I meant to suggest Edgar Wind's, "Art and Anarchy". You might enjoy it, Beak recommended it to me.
The Bird Brain Ponders
The analysis of the Communist fools
is akin to picking out Utah or Nebraska and making generalizations
about America from a group that is not representative of the USA as a whole. As usual Communists know zero about actual history of the subjects they post about. In this case the mentally challenged Troutsky is clearly ignorant of the history of India and Kerala.
Ignorance is a prerequisite for the followers of Marx.
Onto Owen.
A follower of Marx crying about the paternalism of anyone is comedic. Owen was a capitalist who sought humane conditions for his employees. He was guilty of being naive, unlike the criminal psychos
Marx and Engels.
Owen was careful to exclude Marxist criminals from anything he worked on. Owen clearly knew evil when he saw it.
I find it amazing that Capo Ren can repeat Stalinist lies about Polish fascism and pretend to be against Stalin. There is zero difference between Trotsky and Stalin other than nobody ever accused Stalin of incompetence.
Trotsky was a war criminal, mendicant, imbecile who changed his tune when the ice pick was on its way.
There were plenty of innocent people killed by Stalin. However, Trotsky deserved to die for his crimes against humanity. His crimes compare to that of fellow Marxist Saddam.
Perhaps Ren will emulate Marxist Jim Jones next.
Re: Kerala -
Very nice place! I spent many weeks there long ago, and I recall it fondly, despite receiving a nasty bite from a dog while visiting the cemetery in Jew Town. (Jews were established there several centuries BCE.)
@Beak: Kerala is a mainly Christian enclave.
This is simply wrong. Christians are a minority - more there than anywhere else in India except Goa, but still less than 25% of the people. Try devoting your energy to getting the facts and less to name-calling.
The reasons why Kerala does better than many areas of India are complex. To say it's because for many years the government was very Left (not sure it still is) sort of begs the question for me. Why did such a government exist there rather than elsewhere in India?
The social relationships between men and women, and different castes, are different there - that is obvious to anyone who travels through India, or it was when I was there 30 years ago.
As for bloodshed in India, I feel pretty confident in stating that most of it has had its source in communal violence since 1948. That is, Muslim-Hindu conflicts. If you want to argue that this is the result of Marxist agitation then you have also to deal with the clearly Fascist elements of the Hindu Nationalist parties.
Lichanos
Fascist is merely the term used by Stalinists and fake Trotskyites like Ren to describe anyone opposed to the Marxist death cult. This ignores the reality that Il Duce clearly was a socialist who was not an incompetent like Trotsky.
The violence in Kerala was caused by Marxist political criminals. Furthermore the progress in India has come by moving away from Marxism.
Marx = Death
This is true. India wasn't necessarily Marxist, but it was clearly socialist. When it instituted capitalist reforms, things improved, same with China, same with Russia, same with Eastern Europe. The proof is in the pudding.
India up until their reforms was an obvious basket case, but what really can you expect from a nation founded by a man who went around in diapers half the time.
@Beak & Pagan:
Your last comments show a depressing lack of interest in the history and culture of India, about which you feel free to make pointed comments, and ethnic condescenion. Gandhi may not be everyone's type of hero, but he is such, and rightly so, to most Indians. "Diapers" is a stupid and ignorant slur.
As for Beak's remarks on Marxism and violence in India in reply to mine, I spoke of violence throughout India, and its history since '47, not just in Kerala. It is a simple fact that in India there are groups of Hindu nationalist extremists for whom the label fascist is quite appropriate. They are racist, they advocate military action against Muslims and other non-Hindus, they incite bloody violence with mob tactics, and they desire the central state to arbitrate on religion and culture, among other things. They are probably opposed to Marxism, although in India you can't take such things as given, but their target is actually non-Hindus.
Your remarks about Stalinists and Trotskyites - I'm neither - are totally off the mark. Arguing on auto-pilot is not very fruitful.
Post a Comment
<< Home