Monday, March 14, 2011

Middle Class or No Class?

The recent struggle over collective bargaining rights has harnessed a great deal of positive energy. People across the country understand this to be a defining issue of social justice and are struggling to locate it in the wider context of the global capitalist crisis. But in my opinion we only muddle the issue and prevent deeper understanding by constant reference to "building the middle class".

The current progressive/ populist/ labor conjuncture relies on a nostalgic, sentimental approach to the problems now facing workers. It harkens back to the New Deal and Roosevelt or Maynard Keynes for answers to problems fundamentally different from those of earlier times. This approach is doomed to fail because of certain crucial, false assumptions , because "progressive" leadership is wedded to the status quo, and because new voices are excluded from the dialogue.

Even if this crisis WERE the same as the depression of the 1930's, would the Left seek the same accommodation as it did then? In order to save capitalism from itself, the State intervened in a massive way with stimulus, tax policy and the extension of rights but even the turn from laissez faire to a social wage and welfare state policies did not create real economic growth. It is crucial to remember it took war-based expansion for that "middle class" to grow. At the same time this prosperous, manufacturing-industrial base grew, the energy towards building a truly democratic, just system was quashed. Suburbs spread across the landscape but the environment suffered and workers signed no-strike contracts and Taft-Hartley.

We are seeing that same type of reformist strategy now as capitalism is once more saved from itself. This time the calls for "austerity" are creating a backlash over particular budget items but workers accept the basic narrative that they are partners in a process to preserve The American Dream. Lacking a radical perspective, they are being lured by Big Labor and Old Guard Liberals away from any real fight and into yet another accommdation. Yet again they are being told to vote and legislate and regulate their way back to the "middle class" , and despite the treachery and utter corruption of the hollow charade called "politics" they seem willing to yet again follow rather than lead.

The brutal fact is; the worlds workers can not all live what we have called the "middle class" life. We must ask: is the consumption part of that American Dream sustainable? Now that Capital is global the worlds workers can no longer think of their issues in isolation. And it is time to recognize that the Social Democratic welfare state model has also failed. Now the reformed, kinder gentler capitalism of progressivism must be abandoned along with the limited struggle for mere accommodations. A broader, deeper struggle must begin, one informed by a much more radical critique.

The crisis is here. Recall petitions cannot save us now. "There is something going on here...but you don't know what it is.."

13 Comments:

At 7:59 PM, Blogger Frank Partisan said...

I agree with the analysis. The problem is that you offer no solution, or a fighting program.

There was militancy on the ground in Madison, that didn't get expressed on stage. There was a power vacuum, and the Democratic Party stepped in. That is not the end of the story, it's the beginning.

 
At 8:04 PM, Blogger SecondComingOfBast said...

Uh, the Democratic Party didn't step in, they stepped out, out of Madison and all the way to Illinois. That order came from their thug union bosses. Democrats know what side of their bread is buttered, and where the butter comes from. It has a rank, foul taste, and believe me, the Democrats DO swallow.

 
At 3:25 PM, Blogger troutsky said...

Ren: All I asked for was a voice, a chance for the critique of liberalism to be heard. I think that could be done by a Labor Party candidate but in the end the person must not shy from an anti-capitalist position. Not do what Eugene McCarthy or Ralph Nader did and take their campaigns as a serious electoral challenge.

Pagan: "Thugs"? Really? To participate in a serious discussion you can't quote James Cagney.

 
At 5:17 PM, Blogger Ducky's here said...

Poor old world ... Japan nearly hits critical mass and it takes the rest out of the news.

Hillary fires someone for stating that Bradley Manning isn't receiving a resemblance of due process. Who says we don't have political prisoners. Beak must be upset that most of us can't join him in the brig.

Qadaffi sticks around. Not sure what we could have done.

We give the Saudi royal family the green light to invade Bahrain. Freaking wogs were endangering the oil supply, don't take this democracy crap too far.

Sierra Leone goes into civil war. The loser fires on and kills protesting women and there is a sternly worded warning not to do that too often.

The governor of Michigan was voted power to dis-incorporate towns and fire any official in the name of some 'financial emergency'. Not like a Japan type emergency, one where Kapital isn't stealing from the tip jar.

The final nail is being hammered into the union coffin and Pagan thinks this is going to make us all wealthier. Yeah, right, trash the middle class, that should really help the old economy.

... poor old world, we are just trashing the place and the Koch Bros. and the Baggers will just pump up the noise machine and send some punk kid in to make a video to cripple NPR and even Glenn Freaking Beck cried foul. Didn't matter, liberals have no self respect any longer. They all just follow gutless Obama's lead.

Damn it's bad. I need a highball.

 
At 6:11 PM, Blogger SecondComingOfBast said...

Ducky, Glenn Beck is just jealous. Jealousy does happen you know. That recorded video spoke for itself, but more importantly, we have no business funding NPR or PBS. Think about it, if they depended on their own private contributors, they could have whatever editorial stance they wanted to have, and nobody would have a right to complain about it.

We're living in a different world now. The US is no longer the only game in town. We are no longer living in a world when Russia and China were dominated by backwards, secular theocracies, and Europe was in a shambles.

Now, China and Russia have learned the joys of state capitalism, and Europe has been rebuilt, and in some respects is competitive.

And then there's India.

The old game just doesn't work any more.

 
At 7:45 PM, Blogger Ducky's here said...

I'm sorry, Pagan, I disagree. Locally NPR would likely continue without Federal funding but other areas might not be so lucky.

Now mind you, I believe in the four basic music groups; classical, jazz, folk and world as part of a balanced diet. Locally NPR and college radio are the only sources. Commercial jazz and classical stations have disappeared. Commercial world music is really bad salsa. We have a dedicated folk/country station that plays real country and trad folk and it's NPR.

NPR brings this mix into rural areas which might not be able to adequately fund the programming.

We'll also drop the National Endowment for the Arts. I recently worked with a local teacher to develop a study guide for her class field trip to a tremendous exhibit of Dutch "Golden Age" painting at a local museum. It is extremely expensive to mount these shows and it was nice to take advantage of the only chance the kids would have to see this collection in one place.

We deserve better than the "fast food" we hear on rabies radio and high dial music stations.

I went with my niece to a concert Sunday (NEA partially funded). A Mozart program and we really enjoyed the range of expression the pianist displayed. It was inexpensive and she pointed out a lot of subtleties to me. I suppose we could have blown a few hundred at a Bon Jovi reunion concert and commuted down to Foxboro but it wouldn't be the same.

As for news. This nation should be DEMANDING more hard news. NPR is a little better than what's on rabies radio but we could use more Democracy Now or Uprising and I have to go to a college channel to get those. Most of the nation just eats what talk radio puts on the plate. We need alternatives.

 
At 7:48 PM, Blogger Ducky's here said...

By the way Pagan, I am a film editor and I teach an editing class.

My students had it figured out quickly and a forensic analysis of that POS "film" would make everything obvious.

The fact that you don't have a freaking clue what's being stuffed down your throat should give you pause.

You're right, it speaks for itself but you have no clue what it's saying. You just eat what gets put on the plate.

 
At 9:00 PM, Blogger SecondComingOfBast said...

You call NPR and PBS hard news? Shit now, come on. They are obviously left oriented. I don't have a problem with that in and of itself, but then they want to shut down any alternative view. Why should the taxpayers fund that? Of course you live in a world where ABC, CBS, and NBC are conservative, so I guess I'm wasting my breath.

As far as the artistic merits of the broadcasts go, that's a different story, but still, again, why should the government fund it? Most of these stations funding comes from private donations, and from corporate grants.

Maybe if they'd try to be fair and balanced like Fox, they would attract more listeners, and thus get enough donations to make themselves economically viable without government handouts.

And yes, as a sometime watcher of Fox News, I can personally vouch that though they are certainly conservative, they do try to present a balanced view. I ought to know, I've screamed at the motherfuckers often enough.

And you are whistling in the wind trying to turn me against O'Keefe. Dan Rather jacks off at night wishing he had been half the journalist O'Keefe was. The NPR shill said what he said, and you just don't like it.

 
At 12:31 AM, Blogger Frank Partisan said...

NPR is centrist, not left. They have no range beyond the Democratic and Republican Party.

NPR should use its resources, to destroy people like O'Keefe. Even Glen Beck sees through him.

There should not only be public radio, there should be a national theater, dance company etc. Every advanced capitalist country except the US has one.

 
At 3:05 AM, Blogger beakerkin said...

The Duck talks of film editing. The great Marxist Paliwood films of dead kids who were never dead are commie classics. The ends justify the means so lies that serve the cause of communism are just another tactic for the death cult.

The NPR fiasco shows the mental and moral rot of lefties ( limousine Marxists) with their pants down. Yet another wedgie delivered by O'Keefe that shows amoral lefties ranting about dem jooooooos while calling the Tea Party crew racists.

The supposedly "intellectual" NPR
clowns forgot that religious Muslims don't drink wine.

End all funding for NPR now. Demand that all groups that receive
public funding publish donor lists now.

 
At 9:22 AM, Blogger Ducky's here said...

Well Beak, getting back to Trout's thesis. Our level of consumption is unsustainable and our popular culture s structured to promote that consumption. But it's never quite enough, is it?

Pagan is correct in his defense of laissez-faire if you accept his latent premise that we can build a sustainable economy on capitalism's insatiable need for increased consumption. But that's not possible and you get in the double bind with its need for profit which prevents an equitable distribution of basics like health care and education.

A popular culture that promotes passive indiscriminate consumption and even makes news a consumer product is not going to get us out of this bind.

 
At 1:32 PM, Blogger SecondComingOfBast said...

WE do not make news a consumer product, the news makes itself a consumer product. News has always been politicized, from its very inception. There was never any such thing as hard news. It would probably be impossible to present news as hard fact, with no coloring of the facts to suit one agenda or another. People look to the source of information that most appeals to their own preconceived notions. If they can't find it, they just turn it all off.

And by the way, if you really want to do away with capitalism, there's only one sure way to do it. Eliminate freedom and liberty.

Without freedom and liberty, capitalism can't thrive and prosper. With freedom and liberty, you can't stop it. Capitalism is a natural outgrowth of freedom and liberty-not the other way around.

Therefore, put all of society in bondage, and your wish shall be granted.

 
At 9:59 PM, Blogger beakerkin said...

Duncy

Whatever reforms have to be made in the system will be done without commies. Your kind is best deported or sent to mental health facilities.

A Marxist criticizing anything given the record of the sins is hypocrisy
at its worst.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home